|
|
||||
|
Why Whole
Music Learning? Whole Music Learning is the name I've given to my version of music learning that uses a logical whole-part-whole sequence. Whole-part-whole simply means we learn a song as a whole first, break it down into the parts necessary to understand and play it with understanding, then put it back together again into a whole song that we can express in a musically meaningful way. I didn't come up with this idea. Rather, Whole Music Learning emerged from my many experiences, influences, and, most significantly, my time studying with music learning theorist Dr. Edwin Gordon.
Four vocabularies; context vs content Listening and speaking activities provide the context, or the whole in the whole-part-whole process. Contextual activities include listening to, singing and/or playing entire songs, meaningful sections and fragments of songs, and/or tonal and rhythm patterns that come from a song.
Content activities provide the ability to sing or play the song. Content includes
instrumental techniques (the execution skills required to
play an instrument), theoretical analysis, and other activities required to
understand a song from the inside out. I intuitively felt that nearly anyone could be taught to play in a musical manner. It was much later, however, that I realized a priority shift was necessary in order for this to happen. In order for drummers to become musicians, they had to start thinking musically first and "drumistically" second. In other words, if you came to me wanting learn drumming, you'd probably become a drummer. But if you came to me wanting to be a musician, you'd end up being both. It took me many years to fully understand this. In 1979, in order to organize my teaching materials, I began a drum book. Over the next 14 years it evolved into a reflection of the grooves and techniques I had used in my playing career. Then, in 1993, I studied with Dr. Gordon, leading me to question nearly everything. My work with Professor Gordon was so mind and ear opening that I could never teach in the same way again. In fact, I would never think of music itself in the same way. I changed nearly everything in my work, gave the name Whole Music Drumming, and finally completed it in 2002. I continue to use it every day as the go-to source for written materials in my teaching, and it's held up well for me. However, whenever I get around to revising it, I'll include more more on movement and improvisation. More on these subjects in the future.
Through all this, my underlying realization is that traditional music
education is deeply flawed. Traditional music education is more about
content, less about context. It emphasizes reading and writing, and largely
assumes students' listening and speaking vocabularies have been somehow
acquired previously. Even when students are given listening activities,
these activities seem to emphasize appreciation over participation.
It is within this environment that I labor for musical inclusion, in my work
with babies and pre-schoolers, grade school students and for adults as well.
Everyone can be included. Music is as accessible as language, as long as we
present it in the same way. If we listen and speak music and movement
throughout our society, the division will go away and people will be
happier. And, if you take into account all the recent research on music and
the brain, people will be smarter, too. *Simply put, audiation has to do with giving meaning to a piece or passage of music without the music necessarily being physically present. When we audiate, we internally understand not only how the notes and rhythms sound, but we also comprehend any number of additional aspects of the music -- tonality, rhythm, harmony, style and feel to name a few.
|
||||
|
|